您现在的位置:一裁网>> 仲裁数据库>> 司法案例>> 国外法院>> 瑞典 >> 详细资料
Moscow City Golf Club OOO vs Nordea Bank AB
点击数:
【文书性质】判决
【文书编号】 T 4982-11
【发布机构】 Supreme Court of Sweden
【案件类型】 裁决效力
【发布日期】 2012年11月23日
【裁判人员】
【代理律师】
【当 事 人】 Moscow City Golf Club OOO,Nordea Bank AB
【国 别】 瑞典
【主 题】 可仲裁性 裁决效力
【案件摘要】 The appellant appealed to a judgment of the Svea Court of Appeal, alleging that a Swedish arbitral award was invalid, as it resolved non-arbitrable issues breaching Swedish and Russian peremptory laws.
【全文】         

Judgment of the Supreme Court of Sweden, 23 November 2012, Case No. T 4982-11

HD T 4982-11 English

 

HD T 4982-11 Swedish

 

Date of decision

Court

The Supreme Court

Case No.

T 4982-11

Subject Matter

Appeal to judgment of Svea Court of Appeal

Summary

The appellant appealed to a judgment of the Svea Court of Appeal, alleging that a Swedish arbitral award was invalid, as it resolved non-arbitrable issues breaching Swedish and Russian peremptory laws. The Supreme Court of Sweden rejected the appeal and upheld the judgment of the Svea Court of Appeal. The Court found that a dispute is arbitrable if it relates to matters which the parties may settle out-of-court. The Court explained that arbitrable disputes can include non-arbitrable elements and include the application of peremptory rules of law, as long as these peremptory rules do not prevent the parties from reaching an out-of court settlement. Also, for an arbitral award to be invalid, the peremptory element must be of importance, like when the interest of society or of a third party is concretely involved. Finally, the Court emphasized that when deciding the invalidity of an award, the determining factor is whether the parties could have reached an out-of-court settlement at the time when the dispute was resolved, irrespective of whether the arbitration clause could be deemed in breach of peremptory laws when it was entered into.